Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Chariot Campbell v. Kelly Cramer, et al
as 25-1402
Plaintiff:
CHARIOT CAMPBELL
Defendant:
KELLY CRAMER, DAWN CHAPMAN and KEVIN MCCLURE
Hartzol v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2025cv00239
Plaintiff:
Charles S Hartzol, III
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Sara McClure and Jon Loftus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fox v. Carle Richland Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Corey L Fox
Defendant:
Carle Richland Memorial Hospital, Michael Jones, Wexford Health Sources Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MCCLURE v. USA
as 1:2024cv01812
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTONIO MCCLURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Todd, Jaime, et al v. Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Allen McClure, G. T., Andrew Todd and others
Defendant:
Ashley Global Retail, LLC, Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. and Resident Home, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Courney v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03788
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Courney
Defendant:
Anothy Wills, La'Toya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03512
Plaintiff:
Demond Haynes
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Joshua A. Schoenbeck, Anthony B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03493
Plaintiff:
James Tate
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Melvin Hinton, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv14494
Plaintiff:
James Tate
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Melvin Hinton, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
