Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BARTON v. CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2026cv01879
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA BARTON
Defendant:
CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, INDIANA, JULIAN TODD HUCKSTEP, KALEB SWICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS v. GRANGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2026cv01791
Plaintiff:
MEGAN ROSS
Defendant:
GRANGE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Megan Lisota v. Heartland Dental, LLC, et al
as 26-2739
Plaintiff:
MEGAN LISOTA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
HEARTLAND DENTAL, LLC and RINGCENTRAL, INC.
Adam Raney v. Logan Goehl, et al
as 26-2706
Plaintiff:
ADAM RANEY
Defendant:
LOGAN GOEHL, NICHOLAS WODACK, MEGAN LEBERAK and others
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 3:2026cv01203
Plaintiff:
Rafael L Walker and Rafael L Walker-Bey
Defendant:
Jordan Johnson, Megan Hensley, Colby Spriggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Kelly v. Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02247
Plaintiff:
Megan Kelly
Defendant:
Electrolux Consumer Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Brantley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01343
Plaintiff:
Megan Brantley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
