Cases 1 - 10 of 16
GREEN v. GREY et al
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
SHANE MICHAEL GREEN
Defendant:
GREY, D. REAGLE and MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06503
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Delgado Fernandez and Kerr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREEN v. BLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
SHANE MICHAEL GREEN
Defendant:
RYAN BLAND, LANCE D. HAMNER and MICHAEL AVGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 American Disabilities Act
BANEGAS et al v. ANTHONY-ANDERSON CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Dennys Ricardo Aguilar Banegas and Edin Rafael Aguilar Banegas
Defendant:
Anthony-Anderson, Corporation, Garcia Brothers Painting LLC, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Green v. City of Chicago Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv07923
Plaintiff:
Michael Green
Defendant:
City of Chicago Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richemont International SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv02640
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA, Chloe S.A.S., Van Cleef & Arpels SA and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", montblancinstrument.com, seereplicahandbags.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Greene v. Kraft Heinz Food Company
as 1:2016cv05807
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Food Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. USA
as 3:2016cv00093
Petitioner:
MICHAEL GREEN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
