Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rehm et al v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rehm and Matthew Oldanie
Defendant:
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION A/K/A PROGRESS, Welltok LLC, OSF Healthcare System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Small v. Florissant Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv03205
Plaintiff:
Shawnetta Small
Defendant:
Florissant Police Department, Ferguson Police Department, Ladue Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rehm v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq02395
Plaintiff:
Mark Rehm
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AMUNDSEN et al v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2015cv01484
Plaintiff:
DAVID J. ADAMCHICK, JAMES HENERY AMUNDSEN, GOLDIE FAYE ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
D.A. Opportunity Fund, LLC v. Rehm, Robert et al
as 3:2010cv00260
Plaintiff:
D.A. Opportunity Fund, LLC
Defendant:
Robert C. Rehm, Sr. and Jeffry L. Henning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS and UN-NAMED PLAINTIFFS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAIN et al v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00440
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAIN and JOHN E. THOMAS
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE, ALAN FINNAN, BRIAN SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
