Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wolfe et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv15121
Plaintiff:
Blake Wolfe, Kelly Wolfe, Richard Lee and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, GUUARDA WORLD, Joanna Sobran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2011mc00053
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
DAVID BENJAMIN LEBEAU, HERBERT CHARLES SNYDER, JR., MARK ARNOLD WERLING and others
Goetsch v. DOC
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Goetsch
Defendant:
DOC, Jodi Fields and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Attorney General
as 3:2021cv50368
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Turner
Defendant:
Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Select Mgmt Resources
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
Select Mgmt Resources
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meppelink v. Entzel
as 1:2020cv01317
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Meppelink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Benard v. Evans et al
as 1:2018cv06931
Defendant:
Dorothy Brown, Joseph Carlson, Timothy Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Benard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
