Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Reed et al
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Rodrick L Davis
Defendant:
Steve Reed, Calvin Dubois, Aaron Bloomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheron v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Rodrick Sheron
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Approximately $28685 US Currency et al
as 2:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $28685 US Currency and Approximately 120 Ounces of Silver
Claimant:
Kevin Liberty, Aaron Liberty, Pamela Liberty and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Lyke v. Dixon Correctional Center
as 3:2021cv50066
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Lyke
Defendant:
Dixon Correctional Center, Dr. Lankz, John R. Varga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Rodrick Jones
as 20-2278
Defendant / Appellant:
RODRICK JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Harris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2020cv00314
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2019cv08293
Defendant:
Sgt. Rexford, Major Connor, Officer Forester and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castile v. Rodrick et al
as 1:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
Yaphet Castile
Defendant:
. Rodrick, . Whitecotton, Todd Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royal Apartments et al v. Federal Insurance
as 2:2017cv02072
Plaintiff:
Royal Apartments USA Inc , Michael J Henneman and Rodrick L Schmidt
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
