Cases 1 - 10 of 404
Thomas v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
John Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Rush University Medical Center, Jhoanna Mazari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 2:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Shafer et al
as 3:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Cory David Brown
Defendant:
Shafer, Christina Reagel, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penick v. Rush et al
as 3:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Justin L Penick
Defendant:
Rush, English, Devine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Helfrich et al
as 1:2024cv02971
Plaintiff:
Dennis Rush
Defendant:
Bryan Helfrich, Brandon Walls, David Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FULLER v. SANDOVAL et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
DIANA FULLER
Defendant:
SERGIO SANDOVAL, SAN JOSE TRUCKING, INC and RUSH TRUCK LEASING, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
RUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN RUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and RACHELLE BROWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ali v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Mufti Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Muft Abdul El-Malik-Bey Ali, Frances L Smith-Bey and others
Defendant:
K Smith, Morgan, Guajavdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Noonan et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Karan Terrell Rush
Defendant:
CO Patrick Noonan, Sgt Anderson, CO Juan Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
