Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dyson v. Lane et al
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff: Stefannie Dyson
Defendant: Jordan Lane, Jasmine Jermaine Hall, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
C.S., by and through his natural mother and guardian, Deanna Stott, and Deanna Stott, individually v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC
as 1:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: C.S., by and through his natural mother and guardian, Deanna Stott, and Deanna Stott, individually
Defendant: MEAD JOHNSON & COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. SLOWN et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff: ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant: L. SLOWN, K. LEEK, NOAH ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Lt. Galan et al
as 1:2023cv01237
Plaintiff: Frederick Michael Flowers
Defendant: Lt. Galan, Ms. Hill, Ms. Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03275
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ivy v. Rooms-R-Us Adult Family Home LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00996
Plaintiff: Marcus Ivy
Defendant: Rooms-R-Us Adult Family Home LLC, Timothy R Stotts and Chastity Simpson
Stott v. Menard's #3071 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv11037
Defendant: Menard's #3071
Plaintiff: Daniel Stott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stott v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv50280
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff: Maythy R. Stott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
STOTT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01633
Petitioner: WILLIE STOTT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Willie Stott v. USA
as 16-2577
Petitioner: WILLIE STOTT
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?