Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Searles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy J Searles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
EDMONDS v. PMI MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv01838
Plaintiff:
MIESHA ESCHELLE EDMONDS
Defendant:
PMI MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT, LON SEARLE and KENADI WATERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Elzey v. Huntington County et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey
Defendant:
Huntington County, Indiana State of, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILSON
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD, JOHN SEARLE and STEPHEN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDWELL v. SEARLES
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Chester Sidwell
Defendant:
Carly Searles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Searl v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq01188
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Duncan Ross Searl
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plummer v. Villagomez et al
as 2:2022cv01175
Plaintiff:
Loggan T Plummer
Defendant:
Ysamar Villagomez, Ricky Searl and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Searles v. Ohio
as 1:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Tommy M Searles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nate Lindell v. Anthony Meli, et al
as 21-2761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATE A. LINDELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY MELI, JOHN O'DONOVAN, Captain, KEVIN A. CARR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
