Cases 1 - 10 of 412
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powers
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Shan Jumper, . Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Jumper
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Steven C Crabb
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, John Doe, David Suire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Shan Crump
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Paula Lodge, Vipin Shah, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Sullivan v. Gerald Carreon, et al
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SULLIVAN
Defendant:
GERALD CARREON, ELANOR SCHUPICK, CORA BEZOLD and others
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff:
Jordan Penton
Defendant:
Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurene Meger v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv16015
Plaintiff:
Laurene Meger
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shen Zhen Shi Yi Lin Dian Zi Shang Wu Ltd., Shan Wei Shi Cheng Qu Mei Ye Le Fu Zhuang Dian and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shan v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
XIAOFEI SHAN
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
David Mackel v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID L. MACKEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, PAULA LODGE, HEATHER HYMES and others
Speagle v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04148
Plaintiff:
Billy A Speagle
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
