Cases 1 - 10 of 2,460
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Defendant:
ROY, CASEY, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEADLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
STEVE BEADLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund et al v. Ehret, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01366
Plaintiff:
Employers and Operating Engineers Local 520 Pension Fund, Mark Johnson, Chad goldschmidt and others
Defendant:
Ehret, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Vincente Paz v. A & G Gyros Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04163
Plaintiff:
Cupertino Francisco Vincente Paz
Defendant:
A & G Gyros Inc., Nick Tselepatiotis and Steve Tselepatiotis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
McGreevy et al v. AT&T INC.
as 1:2024cv04097
Plaintiff:
KELLY MCGREEVY and STEVE SENTI
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. and DirecTV, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dowell v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01312
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steve A. Dowell
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shareef Childs v. Cheryl Webster, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
SHAREEF CHILDS
Defendant:
CHERYL WEBSTER, CRAIG LINDGREN and STEVE MOHR
Zabala v. Milwaukee County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Aracelio Zabala
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Sheriff's Office, Milwaukee County, Sheriff Earnell Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
