Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Umiya Mataji Sanstha v. City of Elgin, Illinois et al
as 1:2026cv08273
Plaintiff:
Umiya Mataji Sanstha
Defendant:
City of Elgin, Illinois, Roman Mykhaylyuk, Punit Baxi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PETERSON v. BISIGNANO
as 4:2026cv00155
Plaintiff:
CANDY SUE PETERSON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hansen, Trent et al v. Kunes Stoughton RV, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00540
Plaintiff:
Trent Hansen and Angela Sue Hansen
Defendant:
Kunes Stoughton RV, Inc., BMO Bank, N.A. and Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sockness v. DeHaan
as 2:2026cv01025
Petitioner:
Dylan Lee Sockness
Respondent:
Sue DeHaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv01210
Plaintiff:
STACY SUE ANDERSON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Caballero v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00758
Plaintiff:
Rosa Sue Lynne Caballero
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Teeple v. Luginbill et al
as 1:2026cv00186
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Teeple
Defendant:
Brent A Luginbill doing business as Luginbill Excavating, LLC, Hearing Authority and Mark Burry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson, Terry v. Palop, Rey et al
as 3:2026cv00336
Plaintiff:
Terry Jackson
Defendant:
Rey Palop and Sue Harris Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jurgens v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv03092
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Sue Jurgens
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
