Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Schwartzman v. Rogue International Talen Group Inc et al
as 2:2014mc00047
Plaintiff:
Kamian Schwartzman
Defendant:
Rogue International Talen Group Inc, Roger Paul Inc, Roger Paul and others
ROSALES v. CORIZON et al
as 2:2014cv00061
Defendant:
CORIZON, GRAY, LOLIT JOSEPH and others
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ROSALES
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Miles v. Alfred Talen
as 13-1606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR MILES
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED TALENS, Doctor
ODOM v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv00251
Defendant:
JOHN DALLAS, FLINER, KIM GREY and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOM v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv00099
Defendant:
JOHN DALLAS, NURSE FLINER, KIM GREY and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Chambers v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 12-1808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT CHAMBERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF and ALFRED TALENS, Doctor
TILL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv00155
Defendant:
JAMES BASINGER, EDWIN BUSS, DIANA DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. TILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv00144
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DICK BROWN, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, REGISTERED NURSE FLENER and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAY v. LEMMAN et al
as 2:2011cv00141
Defendant:
DAVID BONNER, RICHARD BROWN, D. DAUGHERTY and others
Plaintiff:
KASHMIR L. BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORNE v. GRAY et al
as 2:2011cv00059
Defendant:
MARLA GADBERRY, KIM GRAY and DOCTOR ALFRED TALENS
Plaintiff:
DARRYL HORNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
