Cases 1 - 10 of 5,080
Thomas, Jr. v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gentle Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Yet Classified:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. North Star Barns
as 1:2024cv00219
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH STAR BARNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
LUCAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00891
Petitioner:
DUJUAN LUCAS and DEJUAN LUCAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
GISLER v. UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW THOMAS GISLER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POST OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
PRICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
MARK PRICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
Dewayne Lewis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00403
Petitioner:
Eugene Dawson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
