Cases 1 - 10 of 5,343
BROWNING v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROWNING
Defendant:
ADAMS and WALK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barmore v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Keith D. Barmore
Defendant:
P. Myers, Stevens, M Foureh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Kotteman et al
as 3:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Shaun M Koontz
Defendant:
Steven Kotteman and Stefanie Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhoton et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01419
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Steven Rhoton and Lee Rhoton
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wells v. Veradigm Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04453
Plaintiff:
Juliet Wells
Defendant:
Veradigm Inc., Elizabeth A Altman, P. Gregory Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
MCCAULEY v. NEWREZ LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
DEREK STEVEN MCCAULEY
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, SHANNON O'CONNELL EGAN, CATHY DONDZILA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mazzucco v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00654
Petitioner:
Dominic Gabriel Mazzucco
Respondent:
Warden Steven R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knickerbocker v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Steven G Knickerbocker
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
