Cases 1 - 10 of 1,708
VITACONE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
WALTER VITACONE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brzowski v. State of Illinois Judiciary et al
as 3:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Walter J Brzowski
Defendant:
State of Illinois Judiciary, Laura A Brzowski, Michael A Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BMO Bank N.A. v. Haynie Trucking LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04295
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A.
Defendant:
Haynie Trucking LLC and Walter Haynie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gambaiani v. Green et al
as 3:2024cv03123
Plaintiff:
Grant Gambaiani
Defendant:
Brittany Green, Latoya Hughes, Kindell Kestner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megna v. Anclam et al
as 1:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Walter Joseph Megna
Defendant:
Jeremy Anclam and John Musial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thompson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Walker, Terrance Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. HARRINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
HARRINGTON, MARION COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPT., KERRY FORRESTAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv03589
Plaintiff:
Frances Y Walters
Defendant:
AFAM Concept, Inc. d/b/a JF Labs, Inc.,, Avlon Industries Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
