Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HMUNG v. SCHENCK et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HMUNG and NGUN HMUNG
Defendant:
OFFICER SCHENCK, LIEUTENANT JAMES PRIOR, SARGENT BANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jeremy Schenck
as 20-2353
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY SCHENCK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PHENIX INVESTIGATIONS, INC. v. PCS WIRELESS, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv04241
Defendant:
PINCHUS BENYAHUDA, SCHENCK PRICE SMITH & KING, LLP, PCS WIRELESS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PHENIX INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEFLORE v. SCHENCK PROCESS LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00130
Plaintiff:
LAMAR LEFLORE
Defendant:
SALINA VORTEX CORP. and SCHENCK PROCESS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zach, Thomas v. Heth, Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00693
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Zach
Defendant:
Scott Heth , Robert Schenck, Troy Hernmans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zach, Thomas v. Beahm, Brian et al
as 3:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Zach
Defendant:
Brian Beahm , Brian Green, Troy Hermans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2012cv00051
Plaintiff:
TRACY CONROY, DOE I, DOE II and others
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE PHYSICIAN INVESTMENT CORPORATION, DR. JEFFREY SELBY, SELECT EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Zach, Thomas v. Thorpe, James et al
as 3:2016cv00442
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Zach
Defendant:
James Thorpe , Christine Bratz , Brian Beahm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schenck v. Fulton County, et al
as 1:2015cv01226
Plaintiff:
Jackie Schenck
Defendant:
Fulton County, et al
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Thomas Zach v. Brian Beahm, et al
as 14-2552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS W. ZACH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SCHENCK, Security Guard, TROY HERMANS, JEFF PUGH, CCE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
