Cases 41 - 50 of 1,401
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Seth Bradley Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Kathy L Smith, Dexter Payne and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Deric C Smith, Sr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. West et al
as 4:2023cv01030
Plaintiff:
James Steven Johnson
Defendant:
Shane West, Darrell Elkin, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dayberry v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jim Wayne Dayberry
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Jennifer Osborne, Justin Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Acker-Wynn et al
as 4:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Acker-Wynne, Eric S Higgins, Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Smith
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins and Melanie Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Gelco Fleet Trust et al
as 4:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
David Smith and Kim Smith
Defendant:
Gelco Fleet Trust and Thomas Daniel Perrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Swafford v. Lonoke County Jail
as 4:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Kaitlynn Swafford
Defendant:
Lonoke County Jail, Faythe LaBlanc, Barbara Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 4:2023cv00925
Defendant:
Maria T Travis, Department of Veterans Affairs, Maria Travis and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
