Cases 81 - 90 of 46,421
Smith v. Cigarette Store LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
Angela Smith
Defendant:
Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly, Alliance Hemp Company LLC, Bio Blaze Partners LLC doing business as Global Widget LLC doing business as Mystic Labs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cummings v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dontae Cummings
Defendant:
John Felts, Brett Morgan, Andy Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Mark Porter
Defendant:
Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peeples v. McCormick et al
as 4:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
James Peeples
Defendant:
David McCormick and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hutton v. Blessed Road Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Charles Hutton
Defendant:
Blessed Road Inc and Jennifer Dysart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ward v. Banning
as 4:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
David Ward
Defendant:
JB Banning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
