Cases 21 - 30 of 3,093
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
United States v. John Richmond
as 24-1752
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John Christian Richmond
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant:
Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others
Vanessa Smith v. John Kendricks, et al
as 24-1716
Plaintiff:
Vanessa C. Smith
Defendant:
Dr. John Kendricks, M.D., Primary Care Physician and John S. LaTour, Tax Law
Eric Garland v. Hon. Mary Schroeder, et al
as 24-1698
Plaintiff:
Eric Garland
Defendant:
Hon. Mary Bruntrager Schroeder, in her individual capacity, Hon. John R. Lasater, in his individual capacity, David Q. Betz, Esq. and others
John Scharnhorst, III v. Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, et al
as 24-1681
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Washington County Detention Center, Major Randall Denzer, Washington County Detention Center, Lieutenant Kevin East, Washington County Detention Center and others
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
United States v. Yusuf Jones
as 24-1630
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yusuf John Jones
Bryan Mick v. Barrett Gibbons, et al
as 24-1610
Plaintiff:
Bryan S. Mick, Personal Representative of the Estate of Print Zutavern, Deceased
Defendant:
Deputy Barrett Gibbons, in his individual and official capacities, Deputy Lawrence Stump, in his individual and official capacities, Sheriff Dan Osmond, in his individual and official capacities and others
Appellant:
Nebraska State Patrol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
