Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Dix v. City of Cedar Falls et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Scott Dix
Defendant:
City of Cedar Falls, Jeff Olson, Ron Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Dix v. Cedar Falls et al
as 6:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Scott Dix
Defendant:
City of Cedar Falls, Jeff Olson, Ron Gaines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Demers v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv04011
Petitioner:
Scott Demers
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lloyd v. Newnan et al
as 6:2022cv02012
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
Newnan, Vigil, Julie Lien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeil v. Scott County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Kalandis McNeil, Sr
Defendant:
Scott County Jail and Scott County Jail Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bleil v. SmithCo Manufacturing Inc et al
as 5:2022cv04001
Plaintiff:
Teressa Bleil
Defendant:
SmithCo Manufacturing Inc, Scott Lovell, Matt Lynn Fouts and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Youngbear v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Scott Louis Youngbear
Defendant:
Attorney General Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngbear v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott Louis Youngbear
Defendant:
Attorney General Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Schertz v. Karberger et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Petitioner:
Terry Schertz
Respondent:
Kris Karberger and Scott Eschen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al--PER #18 ORDER STATUS REPORT DUE EVERY 60 DAYS
as 6:2021cv02036
Defendant:
David Scott, Bret Tapken, Ramiz Mujelic and others
Plaintiff:
Levita Simmons, Jeffrey Orvis, Estate of Arthur Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
