Cases 1 - 10 of 1,001
Rued et al v. Hudson et al
as 0:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryll Rued, W.O.R., Scott Daryll Rued and others
Defendant:
Natalie E. Hudson, Charlene W. Hatcher, Mike Furnstahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Hennepin County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King
Defendant:
Hennepin County Jail, Ben, Officer Ogastien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Ogastien et al
as 0:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Ogastien, Henipen County Jail, SGT who Denied my agreviece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gene Scott v. United States
as 24-2256
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott
Defendant:
United States of America
Gerran et al v. City of Ferguson et al
as 4:2024cv00843
Plaintiff:
Alisa Gerran, Lena Rogers, Kwan Scott and others
Defendant:
City of Ferguson, Marquis Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Link et al v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Plaintiff:
Mary Link and Thomas Link
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Jonathan Scott, Alexis Lampkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Pioneer Press News Paper et al
as 0:2024cv01477
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Pioneer Press News Paper and News Reports - Reporters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
