Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 161 - 170 of 74,015
Randy Dabney v. United States
as 24-2072
Other: Randy Dabney
Respondent: United States of America
Otte v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00712
Petitioner: Shawn Otte
Respondent: Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boehler v. Byers et al
as 6:2024cv06043
Plaintiff: Gary L. Boehler
Defendant: Superintendent Jared Byers, Lieutenant Crosby, Lieutenant Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raybourn v. Centurion Medical Services, et al
as 5:2024cv06072
Plaintiff: Connie Ann Raybourn
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections, Chris McBee, Todd Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griswold v. Pillen
as 8:2024cv00116
Petitioner: Richard A. Griswold
Respondent: Jim Pillen
Interested Party: Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Busby v. Galbreath et al
as 2:2024cv04086
Plaintiff: Dennis Busby
Defendant: Andrea Galbreath and Ike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Modesto Torrez v. United States
as 24-2067
Plaintiff: Modesto Alfredo Torrez
Defendant: United States of America
Dallas Hilt v. Clay County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-2054
Plaintiff: Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant: Clay County Sheriff's Department, Phillips, Desk Sgt., Clay County Sheriff's Department, Teale, Deputy, Clay County Sheriff's Department and others
Dallas Hilt v. Vernon County Sheriff's Dept., et al
as 24-2059
Plaintiff: Dallas Cody Hilt
Defendant: Vernon County Sheriff's Department, Highly, Cpl., Vernon County Sheriff's Department, Rima, Officer, Vernon County Sheriff's Department and others
James Robinson v. United States
as 24-2068
Petitioner: James Robinson
Respondent: United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?