Cases 11 - 20 of 169
Wofford v. Strickland et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Omar Wofford
Defendant:
Daniel Strickland, Ashley Lawson and Dale Acosta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Mallory Lawson
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Gardner
as 6:2022cv06111
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lawson
Defendant:
LT Tobey Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plant v. Keener et al
as 4:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Crystal Alexandria Plant
Defendant:
Jennifer Keener, Hayley Lawson, Elkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Lawson
Defendant:
Linda Louis, DeAngilo Earl, Marshall Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Burgie v. Randy Watson, et al
as 22-2235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric C. Burgie
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Former Director of ADC (originally named as Wendy Kelly), Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jada Lawson, Executive Assistant Director, ADC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, ADC (originally named as Watson), Mark Cashion, Warden (originally named as Cashion), Maurice Williams, Major, ADC (originally named as M Williams) and others
Smith v. Lawson
as 2:2021cv04219
Petitioner:
Caleb Lee Smith
Respondent:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Conlin v. Lawson
as 4:2021cv01287
Petitioner:
Dennis M. Conlin, Jr.
Respondent:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frazier v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Alphonso V. Frazier, II
Defendant:
City of Omaha, John Henige, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lawson
as 2:2021cv04115
Petitioner:
Caleb Lee Smith
Respondent:
Teri Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
