Miller Act Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Five Rivers Carpenters, et al v. Covenant Construction Services, et al
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee: Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Royce Peterson and Mike Novy as trustees and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund, and David Unzeitig and Robert Doubek as trustees
Defendant / Appellant: Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Type: Contract Miller Act
Rexel USA Inc v. JDI Integrations, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00704
Plaintiff: Rexel USA Inc
Defendant: JDI Integrations, LLC and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Turtle Creek Construction, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00236
Plaintiff: MMC Mechanical Contractors, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Turtle Creek Construction, LLC and Mid-Continent Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC v. United Rebar, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00714
Plaintiff: Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC and United States of America, for the use and benefit of Nucor Harris Rebar Midwest, LLC
Defendant: United Rebar, Inc., United Ironworkers, Inc., Travelers Casualty & Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Electronic Sound, Inc. v. North American Specialty Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2023cv00199
Plaintiff: Electronic Sound, Inc.
Defendant: North American Specialty Insurance Company and Zata Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
PN Holdings, LLC v. Lam Support Services, LLC et al
as 8:2023cv00080
Defendant: Lam Support Services, LLC, Ice Technical Services Incorporated, Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: PN Holdings, LLC doing business as Unlimited Innovations and PN Holdings, LLC on behalf of itself, Quit Tam Plaintiff on behalf the United States of America doing business as Unlimited Innovations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Meyer Contracting, Inc., the v. Shinn Kellogg, LLC et al
as 0:2022cv03077
In Re: United States of America for the use and benefit of Meyer Contracting, Inc., the
Defendant: Shinn Kellogg, LLC and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Ohio Irrigation Lawn Sprinkler Systems, Inc. v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 6:2022cv03283
Plaintiff: OHIO IRRIGATION LAWN SPRINKLER SYSTEMS INC. and Ohio Irrigation Lawn Sprinkler Systems, Inc. d/b/a Oheil Site Solutions
Defendant: Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company, B2 Constructiors and B2 Constructors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
J & N Seeding, LLC v. Morris Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv03009
Plaintiff: J & N Seeding, LLC and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of J & N Seeding, LLC
Counter Claimant: Morris Inc. and United Fire & Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Covenant Construction Services LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Petitioner: Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Health and Welfare Fund and Five Rivers Carpenters District Council Educational Trust Fund
Respondent: Covenant Construction Services, LLC and North American Specialty Insurance Company
Interested Party: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?