Contract Product Liability Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Mulford v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv03017
Plaintiff: Clayton Mulford
Defendant: Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Meyer et al v. Currie Tech Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv00542
Defendant: Accell North America, Inc. and Currie Tech Corp.
Plaintiff: Marcie Meyer and Michael Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Henley v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00734
Defendant: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff: Robert L Henley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daikin Applied Americas Inc. v. Kavlico Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2015cv01492
Plaintiff: Daikin Applied Americas Inc.
Defendant: Kavlico Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reeves v. Kia Motors America, Inc.
as 4:2013cv00060
Plaintiff: Brian Reeves
Defendant: Kia Motors America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hulsen v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 4:2010cv00103
Plaintiff: David Hulsen
Defendant: Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Godfrey et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv05132
Plaintiff: Andrew J Godfrey, Andrew J Godfrey, Lynda L Godfrey and others
Defendant: Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Architectural Wall Systems, Inc. v. schott north america, inc.
as 4:2007cv00176
Plaintiff: Architectural Wall Systems, Inc.
Defendant: schott north america, inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?