Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Danks v. Zinke et al
as 1:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Danks, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, Bureau of Indian Affairs and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Danks et al v. Zinke et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Edward S. Danks, Sr. and Georgianna Danks
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rieger et al v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rieger , Mark Rieger , Margaret Rieger Peterson and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Continental Resources, Inc. v. North Dakota Board of University and School Lands et al
as 1:2017cv00014
Plaintiff:
Continental Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
North Dakota Board of University and School Lands and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Eric H. Lindquist, P.C., L.L.O. v. Schutt et al
as 8:2017cv00004
Defendant:
Mark D. Albin, BankFirst, Michael C. Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Eric H. Lindquist, P.C., L.L.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Action for Interplea
United States of America v. Flores
as 0:2016cv04026
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Johnny Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
United States of America v. Rodgers et al
as 2:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Curtis C. Rodgers and Linda Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Vladimir Borisovich Brik, Sr. v. United States
as 16-2215
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vladimir Borisovich Brik, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Vladimir Borisovich Brik, Sr. v. United State
as 16-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vladimir Borisovich Brik, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Caldwell et al v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Carl R. Caldwell and Gaye A. Caldwell
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
