Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Reitz v. Ries et al
as 4:2011cv00624
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Reitz
Defendant:
Dustin Ries, Francis G. Slay, Bettye Battle-Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ladd
as 4:2010cv02219
Plaintiff:
Abu Bakr Ladd
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, State of Missouri, St. Louis Board of Police Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miller v. Montgomery County R-II School District et al
as 4:2010cv02165
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Miller
Defendant:
Montgomery County R-II School District, Maria Stille, Lloyd Sachs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Costello v. Feaman et al
as 4:2010cv00425
Plaintiff:
Kevin Costello
Defendant:
Adam Feaman, Eric Bartlett, Board of Police Commissioners of the City of St. Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Swinney v. Greene County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2009cv00215
Plaintiff:
Gerald Heath Swinney
Defendant:
Greene County, Arkansas, Greene County Quorum Court, Greene County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Philip v. Hoelting et al
as 4:2009cv00892
Plaintiff:
Basil O. Phlip
Defendant:
Paul Hoelting, Francis Slay, Todd Epsten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green Tree Servicing LLC v. Thomas et al
as 3:2009cv00050
Plaintiff:
Green Tree Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Larry Thomas and Rosie Lee Thomas
Counter Claimant:
Larry Thomas and Rosie Lee Thomas
Counter Defendant:
Green Tree Servicing LLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency, Dotson Collins and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas and Rosie Lee Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Daniel Habhab, et al v. William Hon, et al
as 07-3386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel L. Habhab, Mustiphie A. Habhab, William M. Habhab and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Hon, Gary Niewsma, Rick Lampe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
