Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Plump v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00121
Petitioner: William Matthew Plump
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Todd Haulk v. United States
as 24-1344
Petitioner: Todd Matthew Haulk
Respondent: United States of America
Matthew Lynam v. United States
as 23-3600
Petitioner / Appellant: Matthew Lynam
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Matthew Bridges v. United States
as 23-3148
Petitioner / Appellant: Matthew Shawn Victor Bridges
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Bunch v. USA
as 4:2023cv00783
Petitioner: Matthew Bunch
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Matthew Rinehart v. United States
as 23-2523
Petitioner / Appellant: Matthew Dylan Rinehart
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Rinehart v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00047
Petitioner: Matthew Dylan Rinehart
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carter v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv04007
Plaintiff: Matthew Carter
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bridges v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00003
Petitioner: Matthew Shawn Victor Bridges
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: Murdoch Walker, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Matthews v. USA
as 4:2022cv00672
Petitioner: Danielle A Matthews
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?