General Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 19,808
Alvarez-Real v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff: Victor Hugo Alvarez-Real
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Antiona Phillips v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1621
Plaintiff: Antiona Lee Phillips
Respondent: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Deaver Davis v. Warden Teresa Bettinger, et al
as 24-1568
Petitioner: Deaver D. Davis
Respondent: Warden Teresa Bettinger and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Debenedetto v. Rardin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00660
Petitioner: Gary Debenedetto
Defendant: Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Webster v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00384
Plaintiff: Gary Leon Webster
Defendant: Tom Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner: Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent: Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
as 0:2024cv01535
Petitioner: David James Cook, SR
Respondent: Redlake Band of Chippewa Indians, the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Patrick v. USA
as 4:2024cv00607
Petitioner: Lonzo Patrick
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valley v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00608
Petitioner: Robert Valley
Respondent: David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quist v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Petitioner: Bradley D. Quist
Respondent: Kelly Wasko and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?