Cases 11 - 20 of 19,775
Campbell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01788
Petitioner:
Clifton Scott Campbell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Sokol Zuko
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Washington v. Nebraska Superior Court
as 8:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Tyriece Washington
Respondent:
Nebraska Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khalaf v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sattar Sabri Khalaf
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bynum v. Woods
as 4:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Darryl R. Bynum
Respondent:
Ryan Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibby v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Katherine Seward Gibby
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederic v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Philip P Frederic
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marshall v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stephan L Marshall
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
