Cases 31 - 40 of 578
Campbell v. Frakes
as 4:2022cv03210
Petitioner:
Herbert L. Campbell
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kellogg v. Frakes et al
as 4:2022cv03202
Petitioner:
Daevier Kellogg
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and Michele Wilhelm
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Wilson
as 4:2022cv00603
Petitioner:
Rodney Scott Brown
Respondent:
Aaron Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davlin v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00301
Petitioner:
Clifford J. Davlin
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Clarinda Correctional Facility et al
as 6:2022cv02035
Petitioner:
Kelvin Lynell Scott
Respondent:
Clarinda Correctional Facility and Stephen Weis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tracy Parnell v. Scott Frakes
as 22-2712
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tracy N. Parnell
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott R. Frakes
Pillow v. Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2022cv00713
Plaintiff:
Allen Scott Pillow
Defendant:
D Hudson and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Stricklin v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00279
Petitioner:
Derrick U. Stricklin
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Malone v. State of Nebraska, et al
as 22-2561
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin W. Malone
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Nebraska and Scott R. Frakes, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Howard v. Frakes et al
as 8:2022cv00254
Defendant:
John J Howard
Respondent:
Scot R. Frakes and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
John Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
