Cases 1 - 10 of 180
King v. Morriss
as 5:2024cv06076
Petitioner:
Christopher M King
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2024cv04071
Petitioner:
James Rogers
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko and Teresa Bittinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otte v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00712
Petitioner:
Shawn Otte
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry W Kelly, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Quist v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Petitioner:
Bradley D. Quist
Respondent:
Kelly Wasko and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Tornquist v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Tornquist
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko, Secretary of Corrections, Teresa L. Bittinger, Warden of SDSP and others
Engel v. Morriss
as 4:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Engel
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tornquist v. State of South Dakota et al
as 4:2023cv04196
Petitioner:
Matthew Tornquist
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, Kellie Wasko, Teresa Bittinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McEuen v. Morriss
as 4:2023cv01270
Petitioner:
Jeffrey McEuen
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Warden of FCI Waseca
as 0:2023cv02502
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
