Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Graham v. Abbey O'Brien, et al
as 24-1295
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Abbey O'Brien, Unknown Probation Officer #1, Unknown Probation Officer #2 and others
Graham v. Apple Store et al
as 4:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Graham
Defendant:
Apple Store, Lens Crafter's, Technical Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christians v. Hanvey et al
as 4:2023cv04137
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Christians
Defendant:
Joe Hanvey, Kellie Wasko, Alyssa Welbig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. City of St. Louis, Missouri
as 4:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
City of St. Louis Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Graham v. United States et al
as 4:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
United States, Leitchfield, KY, Jason Woosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Graham v. Reishus et al
as 0:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Alonzo J. Graham
Defendant:
Warden David Reishus, Dr. James Koenig and Kathy Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Smith et al
as 4:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Roy Moore and Roy J Moore
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Chuck Graham, Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. U.S. Congress of United States
as 4:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
U.S. Congress of United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
