Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hanks v. City of Sikeston et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Steve Hanks
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Scott County, Missouri Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkulari v. Prison Medical Staff et al
as 8:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
Prison Medical Staff, Prison Medical Director, Prison Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkulari v. State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office and Carlos Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Hollinger
as 4:2020cv00874
Defendant:
Hank Hollinger
Plaintiff:
Richard Block
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2018cv02142
Plaintiff:
Jason Everett Hanks, Jr.
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Matt Johnson, Zach Nuehring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jason Hanks
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Miles Kranz, Janelle M. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Hills et al
as 0:2015cv04275
Plaintiff:
Clayton James Hanks
Defendant:
Jason Hills , Dustin Engh , Michael Marcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arkulari v. Lancaster County Jail
as 8:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
Lancaster County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yount v. Hefner et al
as 1:2014cv00113
Plaintiff:
Shawn Yount
Defendant:
Carl Hefner, Hank Trout, Keith Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker et al v. Barnes et al
as 4:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
Maxly Parker and Stacy Paschall Jagers
Defendant:
Adam Barnes, Hank Hollinger, James L Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
