Cases 131 - 140 of 18,354
Bobby Robertson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Robertson
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, James Shipman, Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax and others
Horn v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06049
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lemuel Horn
Defendant:
Mrs. Peterson, Lieutenant Martin and Sergeant Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nard v. Does
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Joseph Antoine C Nard
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Windeknecht v. David Easter, Sr., et al
as 24-1730
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Defendant:
David L. Easter, Sr., Security Staff and Jarrod Hoskins, Security Staff
Rundel v. Turn Key Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Robert Rundel
Defendant:
Turn Key Medical and Bailey Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Joshua Keith Hurt
Defendant:
Brad Snyder and Ashten Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06048
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Walker, III
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry and Wellpath LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shorty v. Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility et al
as 4:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Shorty, Jr
Defendant:
Pulaski County Regional Detention Center, Department of Human Services and Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leodis Randle v. Eric Higgins, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Does, Agents, Dyer, 12th Street Police Officer, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
