Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Dean Ballentine v. Dwight Franklin, et al
as 15-1764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dean Ballentine
Defendant - Appellee:
Dwight Franklin, Shawn Gerdiman and Richard Simmons
Blakely v. Camden, County of et al
as 2:2015cv04001
Plaintiff:
Frank Otto Blakely
Defendant:
Camden, County of , Dwight D. Franklin , Stephen A Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 6:2014cv06137
Plaintiff:
Dwight R Houston
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houston v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2014cv00599
Plaintiff:
Dwight R Houston
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballentine v. Franklin et al
as 5:2014cv06014
Plaintiff:
Dean Ballentine
Defendant:
Dwight Franklin, Shawn Gerdiman and Richard Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFlamme v. Camden County et al
as 2:2013cv04260
Plaintiff:
Donald George LaFlamme, III
Defendant:
Camden County, Camden County Sheriff Department, Dwight Frankland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sey v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
MeLoni Annesta Sey
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Corizon Inc, Ray Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2012cv00166
Plaintiff:
Dwight H Green
Defendant:
Jarvis Hawkins, Lisa Jackson, James Morman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. Glenn et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Dwight C Hopson
Defendant:
Preston Glenn, Melvin Nance, Wendy Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Williams, Jr. v. Nurse Kim
as 12-2053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Arthur Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Cass County Jail, Sheriff Dwight Diehl, Corporal Hofferman, also known as Heffernan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Nurse Kim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
