Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bennings v. Elrod et al
as 6:2023cv06084
Plaintiff:
Wendell Brock Bennings
Defendant:
Chief Steven Elrod, Sheriff Mike McCormick, Captain Joel Ware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Marshall et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Chandler
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, C Douglas, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Steven Chandler
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Chandler et al
as 5:2019cv00338
Plaintiff:
Otha Benson
Defendant:
Arkansas State Crime Laboratory, Rosie Smith Lee, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Wolcott et al
as 4:2019cv04006
Plaintiff:
Dustin Blaine Chandler
Defendant:
Jailer Melissa Brecheisen, Deputy Gustavo Alvarez, Jail Administrator Chris Wolcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Klingensmith v. Cruz et al
as 5:2018cv05153
Defendant:
Nurse Heather Trimmer, Deputy Megan Rutledge, Lieutenant Robin Holt and others
Plaintiff:
Tyler Klingensmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Chandler et al
as 5:2016cv05363
Plaintiff:
Ronnie G. Bowen
Defendant:
Sean Chandler, Kevin Knight, Brackney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. Chandler et al
as 5:2016cv05054
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dodson
Defendant:
Chandler and John Doe Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Chandler et al
as 4:2013cv00665
Plaintiff:
Kataka Nigel Thomas
Defendant:
Jessica Chandler, Chad Pruett, David Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Norfolk v. Leon Vickers, et al
as 13-3423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul Norfolk
Defendant - Appellee:
Leon Vickers, "Jane Doe" Chandler, Dr. Thomas Baker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
