Cases 151 - 160 of 13,700
Crabtree v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Crabtree
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matthews v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Angelica Lynn Matthews
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rauch v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
John Rauch, III
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sims v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06022
Plaintiff:
Tina Sims
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Kathryne Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Guzman v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02146
Plaintiff:
Rene A. Guzman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bales v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv03011
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mark Bales
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dockter v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Angela Dockter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Karen Johnson and Karen Jane Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spangler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00018
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Colleen Spangler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
