Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States v. Richard Hampton
as 22-3199
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Richard H. Hampton
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Eugene Hampton v. Michael Mullen
as 21-3425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Hampton
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Michael K. Mullen
Alonzo Hampton v. Jessica Mickels, et al
as 20-3159
Defendant / Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC, Christopher Budnik, Deputy Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC, William Straughn, Warden, Cummins Unit, ADC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alonzo Hampton
United States v. Natalie Hampton
as 20-1290
Defendant / Appellant:
Natalie K. Hampton
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Bruce Hampton v. Michael Kohler
as 19-2837
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bruce Hampton
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Kohler
Jonathan Elphic v. Franklin County, et al
as 19-2816
Defendant / Appellee:
Brent Symens, County Attorney for Franklin County, Iowa, Martin Petersen, Assistant County Attorney for Bulter County, Iowa, Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jonathan J. Elphic
Peggy Jones v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 19-2260
Defendant / Appellant:
Tony Juneau, In His Official Capacity as a Member of the Arkansas Ethics Commission, Lori Klein, In Her Official Capacity as a Member of the Arkansas Ethics Commission, Alice L. Eastwood, In Her Official Capacity as a Member of the Arkansas Ethics Commission and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Peggy Jones
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Jegley et al
as 4:2019cv00234
Defendant:
Tony Juneau, Sybal Jordan Hampton, Larry Jegley and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
