Cases 1 - 10 of 196
Rachuy v. Koppes et al
as 0:2024mc00042
Defendant:
Harry Jacobs, Joan Nelson Ericksen, Matthew R. Koppes and others
Plaintiff:
Gale A. Rachuy
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Badlands Logistics, LLC v. Washerlesky et al
as 8:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Badlands Logistics, LLC
Defendant:
Peregrine Delivery Solutions, Ltd. Co., Jeff Washerlesky and Nathaniel Jacob
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Empire Commercial, LLC v. Bunde
as 4:2024cv04127
Defendant:
Jacob Todd Bunde
Plaintiff:
Empire Commercial, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) - Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Koch et al v. Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant:
Pleasant Hill R-III Board of Education, Pleasant Hill R-III School District, Andrew Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
United States v. Jacob Lussier
as 24-1535
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob John Lussier, also known as Jacob John Martin
Laura Baldwin v. Joshua Devine, et al
as 24-1510
Plaintiff:
Laura Marie Baldwin
Defendant:
Joshua C. Devine, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge, Callaway County 13th Circuit Court, Kevin M.J. Crane, Individually, doing business as Circuit Judge and others
United States v. Jacob McWaters
as 24-1423
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jacob Paul McWaters
Mujahid v. Jefferson Capital Systems LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Juwaireeyah Kujahid and Juwaireeyah Mujahid
Defendant:
Jefferson Capital Systems LLC and Jacob Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Paytient Technologies, Inc. v. Graham
as 4:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
Paytient Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Jacob Graham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
