Cases 41 - 50 of 238
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation doing business as Amtrak, BNSF Railway Company, MS Contracting, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sparks v. McDonalds Co et al
as 4:2022cv00705
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sparks
Defendant:
McDonalds Co and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosenow v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01841
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. Rosenow
Defendant:
3M Company, 3M Occupational Safety, LLC, Aearo Holding, LLC and others
Morrison v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01808
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morrison
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Scanlon v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01437
Plaintiff:
Brandon K Scanlon
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Shedal v. Atrium Medical Corporation
as 0:2022cv01440
Plaintiff:
Brandon Shedal
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC and Getinge AB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lee v. TransAm Trucking, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee
Defendant:
TransAm Trucking, Inc. and Stephen W. Hilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Presley v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Brandon C. Presley
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Oetken v. Danneman
as 4:2022cv04038
Plaintiff:
Brandon Oetken
Defendant:
Ashley Danneman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
George v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.
as 0:2021cv02628
Plaintiff:
Brandon S. George
Defendant:
Wisconsin Central Ltd. a Delaware corporation doing business as Canadian National Railway Company, a foreign corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
