Cases 11 - 20 of 995
Branca v. Lottinger et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Branca
Defendant:
Robert Lottinger, Steve Powell, Robert Taylor and others
Rene Valdivia, et al v. Derek Porsch, et al
as 24-1668
Plaintiff:
Rene Valdivia and Alexis Free
Defendant:
Derek Porsch, Gabriel Christensen, Derick Seaton and others
Johnson v. Stahl et al
as 0:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Kevin Stahl, Tyler Johnson and Kevin Lease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson-Byrd et al v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Arlene Johnson-Byrd and Louis Byrd
Defendant:
PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Garrett et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Dwayne M Garrett and Paul Leroy Wickham
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Mike Johnson, Eastern District of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Kristine Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Bill Stange, Billy Loflin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Patel et al
as 1:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Janice Oakley Johnson, Alfonzo Johnson and Fred Oakley
Defendant:
Darivyak Patel and Hitesh Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal-Employment Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Milliman v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Lance Gerald Milliman
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, County of Anoka, Brad Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
