Cases 31 - 40 of 221
Clayton Walker v. Cory Shafer, et al
as 22-1610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clayton Walker
Defendant / Appellee:
Cory Shafer, in his individual and official capacity and City of Rapid City
Defendant:
United States, State of South Dakota and Police Dept.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norris Grimes v. Carla Walker, et al
as 22-1465
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris R. Grimes
Defendant / Appellee:
Carla Walker and Yarco Management
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Brooks et al v. Francis Howell School District et al
as 4:2022cv00169
Defendant:
Francis Howell School District, Mary Lange, Michael Hoehn and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gontarz, Katherine Rash and Christopher Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Grimes v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Norris R Grimes
Defendant:
Carla Walker and Yarco Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ellis v. Brown et al
as 4:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Carole Ellis
Defendant:
Walker Brown and Benton, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clifford v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
James E Clifford
Defendant:
Carla Walker and Jonathan R Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Oakridge Properties et al v. Walker et al
as 6:2022cv03013
Plaintiff:
Oakridge Properties, Kathy England, Jolynn Schmitt and others
Defendant:
Alexander Walker and Jonas Chang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
LaVanchy v. Ziegler et al a.
as 2:2021cv04238
Plaintiff:
John LaVanchy
Defendant:
Elizabeth L. Ziegler, J.D. Cheryl D.S. Walker, Helene J Frischer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
