Cases 41 - 50 of 37,887
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rued et al v. Hudson et al
as 0:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daryll Rued, W.O.R., Scott Daryll Rued and others
Defendant:
Natalie E. Hudson, Charlene W. Hatcher, Mike Furnstahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Hennepin County Jail et al
as 0:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King
Defendant:
Hennepin County Jail, Ben, Officer Ogastien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Bellinger
as 0:2024cv02432
Plaintiff:
Arron King
Defendant:
Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Ogastien et al
as 0:2024cv02442
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King, Sr
Defendant:
Officer Ogastien, Henipen County Jail, SGT who Denied my agreviece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gray v. Heber Springs, City of et al
as 4:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Russell Gray
Defendant:
Heber Springs, City of, Brian Haile, Christopher Gracey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sx Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Sex)
Jones v. St. Louis County Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00880
Plaintiff:
Karen Jones
Defendant:
St. Louis County Missouri and Amanda B. McNulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
