Cases 51 - 60 of 394
Scott v. Cox et al
as 5:2022cv05151
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cox et al
as 6:2022cv06086
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2233
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moore v. Partyka et al
as 0:2022cv01477
Plaintiff:
Andre Moore
Defendant:
Officer Tony Partyka, Officer Neal Walsh, Officer John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laliberte v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
David Laliberte
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman et al v. Harness et al
as 3:2022cv03017
Plaintiff:
Russell Goodman, Jr., Russell Goodman, Sr. and Hellen Sue Goodman
Defendant:
Jimmy Dale Harness and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodman et al v. Harness et al
as 2:2022cv02062
Plaintiff:
Russell Goodman, Jr., Russell Goodman, Sr. and Hellen Sue Goodman
Defendant:
Jimmy Dale Harness and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Koester et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Officer Dickerson
Defendant:
Christopher E Koester, Kenneth L. Gregory, Mark D Eberwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaplan et al v. Harrington et al
as 0:2022cv00640
Plaintiff:
Zoe Kaplan, Jack Flom and Samira Hassan
Defendant:
John Harrington, Sarah Strommen, Matthew Langer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
