Cases 71 - 80 of 583
Billy Tyler v. Physicians Mutual, et al
as 22-2522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Tyler and Billy Roy Tyler
Defendant / Appellee:
Physicians Mutual and 401 K Administrator, for Physicians Mutual
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Brandon et al v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, et al
as 4:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
Wanda Brandon, Andrew Craig, Alice Crockett and others
Defendant:
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Kelvin R. Adams, Charles K. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Kulesa et al
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tamala T Jones
Defendant:
Logan K Kulesa, Shawn M Jones, Jacksonville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Glover v. Trelstad et al
as 0:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Glover
Defendant:
Brad Trelstad, Brad Lindberg, Jason Bergstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Billy Tyler v. Physicians Mutual, et al
as 22-1909
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Billy Tyler
Defendant / Appellee:
Physicians Mutual and 401 K Administrator, for Physicians Mutual
Rick Searcy v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al
as 22-1873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rick Lee Searcy
Defendant / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, George A. Pickett, Nina Pickett "The Estate of George Pickett" and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1611
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
