Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rogers v. Columbia County et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Randy DeWayne Rogers
Defendant:
Columbia County, Columbia County Sheriff's Office, Michael Loe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinshaw v. Columbia County, AR
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hinshaw
Defendant:
Columbia County, Arkansas, Leroy Martin, Jerry Maness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Flanary v. Elkin et al
as 2:2022cv02174
Defendant:
Jerry Dorney, Darrell Elkin, P.A., Ricky Denton and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flanary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Elkins et al v. Washington et al
as 4:2021cv01360
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Elkins and D. J. L.
Defendant:
Jesse C. Washington, Angelina M. Washington, State of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv01467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elkins v. Washington et al
as 4:2021cv00690
Defendant:
Jesse C. Washington and Angelina M. Washington
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Elkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabbard v. Elkins Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv05059
Defendant:
Bryan Watts, Bill Rhodes, James Todd and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Gabbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04115
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumbales et al v. City of Vandalia, Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Raymond Bumbales , William Parker and William Jones
Defendant:
City of Vandalia, Missouri , Chase Waggoner, Christopher Hammann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
