Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Ehrenfeld v. McDonough et al
as 6:2024cv03021
Plaintiff:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, Merrick Garland and Charlotte Burrows
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jay Ehrenfeld v. Stan Pietrusiak, et al
as 23-2136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Defendant:
Dat Tran, Acting Secretary - Department of Verteran Affairs and A.G. Merrick B. Garland
Defendant / Appellee:
Stan Pietrusiak, Director of EEOC and Denis McDonough, Secretary of the Department of Veteran Affairs
Jones v. Wright
as 4:2022cv00856
Plaintiff:
Mary Jones
Defendant:
Herbert Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Carter v. Lefler et al
as 0:2022cv01754
Plaintiff:
Leon Henry Carter
Defendant:
Herbert P. Lefler and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hackett v. Healthworks Medical
as 4:2021cv00961
Plaintiff:
Herbert Hackett
Defendant:
Healthworks Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ehrenfeld v. Tran et al
as 2:2021cv04026
Defendant:
Stan Pietrusiak and Dat Tran
Plaintiff:
Jay Ehrenfeld and Jay Herbert Ehrenfeld
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Igbanugo v. Minnesota Office of Lawyers' Professional Responsibility [OLPR] et al
as 0:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Wilson Law Group, Tommy Krause, Brian Aust and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Igbanugo and Herbert A. Igbanugo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sturgeon et al v. Faughn et al
as 3:2018cv00214
Defendant:
Brodie Faughn, Jeff Sanders, Herbert Todd and others
Plaintiff:
James O'Hara, Whitney Tracy, Shane Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Wright
as 4:2018cv00195
Plaintiff:
Derrick Morgan
Defendant:
Herbert Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bundy v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Herbert E Bundy
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
