Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Nerad v. Regions Hospital et al
as 0:2024cv02248
Plaintiff:
Patrice V. Nerad
Defendant:
Regions Hospital, Dr. Barclay Jones, Ramsey County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Patton et al
as 2:2024cv02060
Plaintiff:
Aiden Jones
Defendant:
Heather Patton, Jefferey Wayne Phillips, Carol Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Pulaski, County of et al
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Khakeem Marquis Williams
Defendant:
Pulaski, County of, Eric Higgins, Mark Swaggerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
White v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
Edward White
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Ervin v. Pulaski County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Nandre Ervin
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas, Eric Higgins, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Burchfield v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv00339
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Robert R Redfield, Does 1-4, NLRPD Officers, Arkansas Bar Association Members, General Assembly of Arkansas Members and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley C Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Regenold v. Higgins
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Tony Higgins
Plaintiff:
Myles Regenold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
